|
Working Papers |
This page contains the listing of working
papers that have been produced up till now by MEFISTO members. To see an abstract, click on the title of the document.
- Work Package 1
- WP1-1'
Gammaitoni, L., Goillau, P., The
Approach Case Study: Description and Requirements
- WP1-2
Gammaitoni, L., Goillau, P., ATC
Annotated Bibliography and ATC Modelling Survey
- WP1-3'
Tahmassebi, S., Druart, J., Novalès, L., The En-Route Case Study
- WP1-5'
Gammaitoni, L.The Aerodrome
Case Study: Description and Requirements
- WP1-6'
Bastide R., Palanque P., Object
Oriented Diagrams for Domain Modelling
- WP1-7
Bastide R., Palanque P., Draft
model of domain for ATC (Druides)
- WP1-8
Fields, B., Wright, P., Error
tolerance in collaborative systems
- WP1-9
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Requirements
and Formal properties on ATC
- WP1-10
Marti, P., Palmonari, M., Paternò, F., Santoro,
C., Task Analysis review
- WP1-11'
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Safety
and Usability Requirements: State of Art
- WP1-12
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Applying
task models to en-route case study
- WP1-13
Fields, B., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., A HAZOP-based method for
requirements elicitation
- WP1-14
Marti, P., Palmonari, M.,Activity
analysis of the approach phase
- WP1-15
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi, S., The impact of different media
on safety and usability of interactive ATC
applications
- WP1-16
Fields, B., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi,
S., A method for the
comparison of design options for allocating
communication media in a cooperative and safety-critical
context
- WP1-17
Fields, B., Scenario-Based
Requirements Engineering - A Review of the CREWS
project
- WP1-18
Marti, P., Palmonari, M., Montani, S., Sabbatino,
V., Scenarios for Aerodrome
Case Study
- WP1-19
Paterno', F., Mancini, C., Developing
task models from informal scenarios
- WP1-20
Tahmassebi, S., Gaspard-Boulinc, H., En-route
case study scenarios
- Work Package 2
- WP2-1
Duc Hoa, L., Palanque, P., Bastide, R., An algorithm for the detection
of liveness in free choice Petri nets by the
calculation of siphons and traps
- WP2-2
Bastide, R., Palanque, P., Duc Hoa, L., Muñoz, J.,
Integrating rendering
specifications into a formalism for the design of
interactive systems
- WP2-3
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Integrating
formal techniques in the design of User Interface
- WP2-4
Navarre, D., Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Sy,
O., Formal
Specification of the DRUIDES prototype
- WP2-5
Navarre, D., Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Sy,
O., Specification of
Middles Touch Screen using Interactive Cooperative
Objects
- WP2-6
Sy, O., Navarre, D., Le, D., Palanque, P., Bastide, R.,
Formal
definition of Interactive Cooperative Objects
- WP2-7
Palanque, P., Navarre, D., Gaspard-Boulinc, H.
MEFISTO Method version 1
- Work Package 3
- WP3-1
Tahmassebi, S., Courteix-Kherouf, S., CPDLC in MIDDLES
- WP3-2
Rossi, M.C., Sabbatino, V., The
MIDAS prototype
- WP3-3
Paterno', F., Santoro, C., Task-based
design of aerodrome case study
- WP3-4
Palmonari, M., Marti, P., Scenarios:
from analysis to design
- WP3-5
Gaspard-Boulinc, H., Tahmassebi, S., MIDDLES
presentation
- WP3-6
Gaspard-Boulinc, H., Fleury, L., MIDDLES
improved prototype
- Work Package 4
- WP4-1
Wright, P. C.Concepts for
usability evaluation
- WP4-2
Fields, B., Goillau, P., Fairburn, C., Wright, P.,
Techniques for usability
evaluation
- WP4-3
Wright, P., Towards
a Mefisto Method for the Concurrent Engineering
of ATC Prototypes
- WP4-4
Gaspard-Boulinc, H., Comments
raised by the Use of CTT
- WP4-5
Fairburn, C., Wright, P.C.W., THEA
MIDDLES Analysis
- WP4-6
Rossi, M.C., Sabbatino, V., Comments
raised by the Use of CTT and Scenarios
- WP4-7
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Using
Systematic Inspection-Based Usability Evaluation Methods in
Software Development
- WP4-8
Fairburn, C., Goillau, P., Wright,P.,
CTTE
Co-operative Evaluation
- WP4-9
Fairburn, C., Goillau, P., Wright,
P., CTT
Notation Evaluation (theory)
- WP4-10
Marti P.,
Scrivani P., Usability
and Safety Assessment
Home Overview Contact list Planning of Work Documents Workspace Related Links Statistics